Safety and Tolerability of Sauna Detoxification for the Protracted Withdrawal Symptoms of Substance Abuse

Abstract:

Objective:

Protracted drug withdrawal symptoms can last months or years after drug cessation, often precipitating a return to substance misuse. We evaluated the safety and preliminary health benefits of a unique chemical exposure regimen based on exercise, sauna and therapeutic nutrients.

Methods:

This was a prospective evaluation of 109 individuals sequentially enrolled into a sauna detoxification component of a multi-modal, long-term residential substance abuse treatment centre.

Results:

Data from medical charts, client self-reports and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) responses indicated that the Hubbard sauna detoxification method was well tolerated, with a 99% completion rate, including one human immunodeficiency virus and nine hepatitis C positive clients. There were no cases of dehydration, overhydration or heat illness. Statistically significant improvements were seen in both mental and physical SF-36 scores at regimen completion, as well as in Addiction Severity Index and Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Short Screener change scores at rehabilitation program discharge, compared with enrolment.

Conclusions:

The regimen lacked serious adverse events, had a very low discontinuation rate and high client-reported satisfaction. The SF-36 data indicated improved physical and emotional symptoms. Therefore, broader investigation of this sauna-based treatment regimen is warranted.

Introduction

The successful management of addiction must thoroughly address its multifaceted disruptive effects and help people to regain control of their lives. Current best practices emphasize a psychosocial approach with therapeutic adjuncts to prevent relapse. Protracted withdrawal symptoms (signs and symptoms that persist, evolve or appear well past the expected timeframe for acute withdrawal) can precipitate relapse. Such symptoms include cravings, disturbances in sleep and mood, low-level physical discomfort and reduced cognitive function that persist for 6 months to many years after achieving sobriety.^{1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1}

Amelioration of withdrawal symptoms is important to patients and improves recovery.⁵ Using the RAND Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Raish et al.⁶ found that well-being improves during the first 4 weeks of substance abuse treatment, a period that includes the acute withdrawal phase, but that subsequent SF-36 scores show little further improvement, levelling out at or slightly below population norms. Despite treatment, perception of well-being in addicted individuals is consistently lower than in the general population^7,8 and in patients with other serious chronic illnesses, such as diabetes and hypertension.^{9, 10, 11}

There is limited research on the aetiology and mechanism(s) that might explain how symptoms can persist despite a long period of abstinence. Acknowledging that the protracted withdrawal syndrome of addiction may be similar to exposure to other types of chemicals may improve symptom management.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention¹² recommends the recognition and treatment of chemical-related illnesses based on clinical signs or patterns. Multisystem symptoms such as headache, fatigue, mood changes, sleep disturbances, achiness, numbness, tingling and other generalized symptoms are common signs of chronic exposure.¹³

Exposure to pesticides, environmental endocrine disrupters and heavy metals has striking effects on the dopamine-mediated reward, craving-related and reinforcing effects of drugs.^14.1 Through mechanisms not yet understood, both drugs^15,16 and environmental chemicals¹⁷ cause neuro-chemical, behavioural and endocrine alterations, disrupt cortisol and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and may prolong cravings, depression and dysphagia.¹⁸

Cecchini & Lopresti^19.1 presented pilot evidence that cocaine and benzodiazepine metabolites can be detected in the sweat and urine of previously abstinent participants undergoing sauna detoxification. The present study is the first large-scale evaluation of the utility and safety of the Hubbard sauna regimen for addressing the effects of illicit drug use.

The Hubbard detoxification protocol combines exercise, nutrient supplementation and low-temperature sauna to enhance chemical elimination and improve symptoms common to chemical exposures.^20.1 After the protocol’s release in 1979, Schnare^21.1 described the regimen’s safety and ability to reduce symptoms and improve mental functioning among individuals with a variety of chemical or illicit drug exposures. In nearly 40 years of application of this regimen to occupational or environmental exposures, studies have shown statistically significant reductions in human chemical pollutants, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins,^22,23 and subsequent improvements in health.^24,25 Kilburn et al.²⁶ measured improvements in long-term memory, cognitive dysfunction and peripheral neuropathy among firefighters who completed sauna detoxification 6 months after PCB exposure from burning transformers. Tsyb et al.²⁷ described the safety and long-term health improvements in clean-up workers after the Chernobyl disaster. Ross & Sternquist²⁸ described health improvements and reduced symptoms of chronic neurotoxicity among police officers exposed to methamphetamine during law-enforcement activities.

This paper presents the safety profile, overall client experience, client satisfaction and functional health outcomes of the Hubbard sauna detoxification regimen delivered as one component of a comprehensive residential addiction treatment program. The regimen has been studied primarily in the context of occupational and environmental exposures. This is the first large-scale safety study of the use of this regimen in aiding recovery from illicit drug and alcohol misuse.

Methods

This was a prospective chart evaluation of a convenience sample of 109 clients consecutively enrolled in the sauna regimen known as the New Life Detoxification Program (NLDP); one of ten treatment modalities used in the Narconon residential drug treatment program.²⁹ This paper represents one aim of a larger outcomes study and was reviewed and approved by Chestnut Health Systems (Bloomington, IL) (IRB Approval #1078-0912).

Description of the setting, study group, inclusion and exclusion criteria

The Narconon of Oklahoma facility was categorized as an ASAM (American Society of Addiction) Level-III Clinically Managed Low-Intensity Residential Service using the American Society Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance Abuse Disorders and accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation. Medical oversight was provided by a doctor of osteopathy with an addiction specialty and 24-hour nursing staff.

Narconon program exclusion criteria were as follows: As medication is not used as a treatment adjunct, the program does not accept individuals with a history of psychosis, extensive psychiatric treatment or suicide attempts.

Regimen exclusion criteria were as follows: Women who are pregnant or lactating; the presence of active cancer (excluding skin cancer) or current receipt of cancer treatments; individuals who are wheelchair bound; individuals with open and infectious skin lesions; individuals diagnosed with heart disease or who have cardiac medication requirements of sufficient severity to warrant concern based on physician discretion; and any medical condition that contraindicates exercise or exposure to mild heat stress based on physician discretion. Under certain circumstances, the doctor can recommend slight protocol modifications.

Alcohol, medications, drugs of abuse and viral hepatitis (a common sequela of addiction) can cause liver inflammation, as indicated by elevated liver enzymes. Only participants with liver enzymes within range or minimally elevated can begin the NLDP. Individuals with liver enzymes well above the upper limit of normal at enrolment are retested after 3 weeks of abstinence, adequate hydration and occasionally provided herbal liver support, usually OptiCleanse® (Xymogen Inc., Orlando, FL, USA) or milk thistle. If liver enzymes remain elevated, subsequent tests are performed weekly until the individual is cleared for the NLDP.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: Medical examination to assess for exclusion criteria and provide any participation recommendations and written consent to participate in the research, including release of medical and rehabilitation-related records for review. Two clients declined to participate.

Summary of the New Life Detoxification Program (NLDP)

Prior to participating in the NLDP, clients complete a non-medical withdrawal program that includes communication exercises. Following NLDP completion, clients complete additional behavioural, life skill, relapse prevention and community reentry steps.

As described by Hubbard^20.2 and Schnare et al.,^21.2 regimen components include the following:

1. 20–30 minutes of moderate aerobic exercise (typically running on a treadmill or equivalent);
2. gradient increases of single dose, immediate-release crystalline niacin, starting at 100 mg per day and titrated higher based on niacin flushing and other responses until therapeutic doses are achieved;^{30, 31, 32}
3. comprehensive nutritional supplementation; and
4. moderate temperature sauna therapy totaling about 4½ hours daily with frequent breaks for cooling, hydration and electrolyte replenishment.

Trained supervisory staff ensure fidelity; observe and record the response to niacin; monitor fluid and electrolyte intake to avoid dehydration, overhydration, overheating and electrolyte deficits; and record 24-hour physical and/or emotional events. Any injury, potentially infectious symptoms, dehydration, heat events or other perceived health risks, including any that manifest outside of program hours, are referred to on-site 24-hour medical staff for evaluation.

Participation is daily. The response to niacin is patient specific and determines whether or not the dose will be increased. Program completion is typically achieved in 2–4 weeks.

The 8–10-person sauna is constructed of birch wood and equipped with flow-through venting to the outside and a floor drain. A tempered glass door permits direct assessment of sauna participants by trained supervisorial staff. A stable temperature of 60–800C is produced by granite stones surrounding a ceramic heat coil with a 15,000-W capacity, (240 V, 62.5 A) and monitored by regimen staff. Consistent with protocol specifications,^20.3 the heater emits full spectrum infrared wavelengths and matches the type of sauna conditions that have been used for thousands of years.³³ A nontoxic, dilute fragrance-free soap solution is used to clean the sauna daily.

All participants received client orientation that comprised a description of the regimen steps and theory. As explained above, when substances are released from bodily stores, such as fat (adipose), a person may re-experience to some degree a sensation of exposure. Clients are instructed to report all emotional and physical events on a structured Daily Report Form used for case management.

Supervisory staff set expectations for proper schedules, sleep, hydration, increased vegetable intake and other habits in accordance with the physical rigor that participation in the regimen demands. All individuals are trained in basic cleanliness protocols to prevent disease transfer; additional hygiene steps are followed for individuals who are positive for viral hepatitis or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antisera.

Outcome measures and analysis

A structured Daily Report Form is completed for every client during each daily session. The NLDP system of ‘measurement-based care’^34.1 includes client blood pressure and weight at the start and finish of each session, exercise duration, sauna duration, niacin dose and effects, additional vitamins and doses, quantity of water and electrolytes consumed, hours and quality of sleep, and 24-hour physical and emotional events. Following specific written guidelines, these measures guide decisions about changes to niacin and supporting nutrient doses, monitor and correct any therapy drift and monitor client progress through to completion.

Medical records data includes enrolment medical examination and drug use report, comprehensive metabolic panel and complete blood count, HIV and hepatitis anti-sera tests, plus subjective, objective, assessment and plan (SOAP) notes from any visits to medical personnel during participation in the detoxification protocol.

The SF-36^35.1 measures health-related quality of life. The respondent answers 36 questions about how they have felt in the last 4 weeks. The SF-36 has been validated as a substance abuse treatment outcomes measure and clinical tool.³⁶ It provides an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health summary measures, allowing for comparisons between patients with a wide range of health problems.^34.2

A Treatment Process Questionnaire (TPQ) developed for this project assesses the client’s understanding of each completed program component, their satisfaction with it and the perceived benefit to treatment goals. At completion, participants are also asked to summarize any ‘success’.

The Addiction Severity Index (ASI)³⁷ and the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Short Screener (GAIN-SS)³⁸ are completed by interview at enrolment and discharge, and will be followed up at 6 months and 1 year as part of a larger trial. The ASI is a semi-structured, 175-item interview designed to address seven potential problem areas in substance-abusing patients: medical status, employment and support, drug use, alcohol use, legal status, family/ social status and psychiatric status. The GAIN-SS measures severity of four independent dimensions of emotional/behavioural health problems as well as the recency of the problem in the past 30 days, past 90 days, during the previous year or over the lifetime.^39.1

Data extraction

Study staff extracted all physical and emotional events noted on the Daily Report Forms into Excel spreadsheets, regardless of whether they were anticipated (e.g. the flush response to niacin) or unanticipated. All visits to medical professionals, the reason for the visit and the findings were also tabulated. Because the regimen requires a 7-day/week rigorous schedule, data were also compiled for missed treatment days and categorized into medical or nonmedical causes.

Clients enter SF-36 and TPQ data (including open-ended, essay-style program comments) directly into a data-protected electronic records database. Narconon staff enter ASI and GAIN-SS interview answers, program start and end dates, start and completion dates for each modality, failure to complete and client-given reason for not completing. As the records are data protected, responses on each instrument cannot be changed once entered and any changes to completion status or other information entered by Narconon staff are recorded in a change log.

Data cleaned of identifiers except a unique study ID were uploaded into SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for analysis. The means and standard deviations of test scores were compared before and after program participation. Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t-tests with paired scores for pre/post comparisons or unpaired scores for comparison with published SF-36 general population norms.

Results

Client demographics and drug use characteristics

Tables 1 and 2 show the distribution of age, sex and primary drug of choice of the 109 participants. Two pregnant clients were ineligible for this component of the Narconon program and their data were therefore excluded from the results. This project reviews the remaining 107 individuals (33 women and 74 men) enrolled in the New Life Detoxification portion of the Narconon program.

HIV and hepatitis antisera, and liver enzymes

Nine individuals were hepatitis C (HepC) positive and one was HIV positive. The HIV positive and all but one of the HepC positive participants had within-range liver enzyme profiles; one HepC positive participant had 174 U/L gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) at enrolment that normalized prior to beginning the NLDP.

At program enrolment, four individuals had aminotransferases (AST and/or ALT) elevated more than twice the normal range (109–222 U/L and 149–359 U/L, respectively) and one of these individuals also had 209 U/L GGT, all of which normalized with abstinence. An additional six individuals had a GGT range of 151–391 U/L at enrolment, which normalized with abstinence.

ASI and GAIN-SS scores are presented to provide a broader understanding of the clientele for potential comparison with other substance abuse populations. Tables 3 and 4 show the ASI and GAIN-SS means of the 109 participants at baseline (program intake) and the same statistics for the 76 participants who completed all 10 program modalities and were discharged. The New Life Detoxification regimen is an early program step followed by a series of behavioural and life skills modalities. At the time of data analysis, 13 clients remained active in the behavioural and life skills portions of the Narconon program; 18 had discontinued treatment without completing the behavioural and life skills series.

Table 3 shows the mean ASI scores. In the ASI, composite scores are not compared with each other. In other words, a drug use score lower than the employment score does not indicate that employment is a more severe problem. It was expected that the employment composite score would increase for clients in a residential rehabilitation program. The ASI has been used extensively for treatment planning and outcome evaluation.

Treatment length and completion rates

The length of the full Narconon residential program averaged 102 days among this group. As shown in Table 5, the portion of time in treatment prior to commencing the NLDP was approximately 2 weeks (14 days) and the NLDP averaged 29 days. The completion rate for the NLDP was 99%.

Client self-report experience of the sauna detoxification regimen

Table 6 shows the frequency of NLDP TPQ responses as a percentage of total responses. The final question is an open-ended, essay-type question asking participants to state their program perceptions. Participants returned answers averaging 94 words (range 14–250 words).

Every participant noted positive improvements: 68% reported improved energy levels, 51% said they could now ‘think clearly’, 54% stated that they were drug and chemical free (although all the participants understood that this was an aim of the regimen), 28% stated they could now sleep well despite irregular sleep patterns at the start of the regimen, 26% remarked that they no longer craved drugs or alcohol. Responses included a diverse array of physical changes, from healed track marks to mitigated pain, improved vision or hearing and a positive outlook or certainty regarding repairing social situations and living a drug-free life.

Change in health-related quality of life with sauna detoxification

The SF-36 scoring mechanism produces an 8-scale profile of functional ability and physical and mental well-being in the last 4 weeks. Table 7 and Figure 1 show SF-36 change scores at program enrolment (intake), prior to the start of the NLDP and at completion of the NLDP, as well as the discharge scores for those who had completed the full program as of this analysis. Pre- and post-NLDP scores and full program discharge scores were compared with baseline scores and with SF-36 US adult population norms.

The SF-36 yields scores from 0–100 for eight scales. Higher scores indicate better self-assessed health and well-being: Physical Functioning (PF), Role Limitations due to Physical Health (RP), Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems (RE), Energy/Fatigue (EF), Emotional Well-being (EW), Social Functioning (SF), Bodily Pain (BP) and General Health (GH), plus one question about perceived health change in the last year.

For five of the scales (PF, RP, RE, SF and BP), a score of 100 indicates the absence of limitations or disability. On three scales (EF, EW and GH), a score of 100 indicates a positive state of well-being.

As a guide, a change of 4 points is clinically significant.^35.2

At enrolment, program participants reported greater PF scores than RAND population norms and similar PF and GH scores, but greater impairment on all other scales. During the 2-week acute withdrawal phase, all scale scores improved from baseline: p < 0.001 for all scales except PF (p = .027), RP (p = 0.003) and BP (p = 0.067) and scores on all scales except EW and SF approached or exceeded population norms.

During the 2–5-week NLDP sauna regimen, all scale scores continued to increase such that post-detoxification scores greatly exceeded population norms for four scales (PF, RP, RE and SF), approaching or equal to 100 (p < 0.001). Change scores on each scale were greater than improvements measured during the withdrawal phase.

Anticipated and unanticipated discomforts and medical events during sauna detoxification

The US Food & Drug Administration defines an adverse event as ‘any undesirable experience associated with the use of a medical product in a patient’ and provides a list of what problems are considered serious.⁴⁰

Table 8 shows the frequency of different reported events and whether or not the event led to a medical consultation, missed treatment day(s) or program discontinuation. The most frequent reason for physician visits was body aches. Although this may be regimen-related, it is also a result of the osteopathic physician–participant relationship and the convenience of osteopathic manipulations.

Common reasons for missing treatment days were insufficient sleep (10% of clients), unrelated medical appointments (10%, usually off-site; see footnote to Table 8) and digestive discomfort (7%). Per protocol, patients who achieve less than 6.5 hours of sleep have their next day’s treatment shortened to a minimum of 2.5 hours. Clients who have had insufficient sleep to tolerate even a shorter session instead receive hands-on assistance to remedy the sleeplessness. As the NLDP regimen is delivered 7 days a week, some clients have legal, dental and other appointments that cannot be rescheduled and cause missed days.

Of the 107 eligible individuals, only one did not complete the regimen. Noncompletion was owing to excessive program rule violations resulting in referral to a higher level of residential care.

Discussion

Why might a chemical exposure regimen benefit the substance-abusing population?

Drugs add to the complex toxic chemical milieu that affects health and behaviour. In terms of chemical exposures, the concept of detoxification, more accurately ‘biotransformation’, refers to the metabolic processes by which the toxic qualities of a substance are reduced and then eliminated by the body, potentially resulting in diminished symptoms. In substance abuse treatment, reductions in acute (primarily physical) symptoms, such as sweating, nausea, rapid heart rate and intense drug craving, determine when withdrawal may be considered clinically complete; this typically occurs in a few weeks. However, a constellation of symptoms, including cravings, disturbances in sleep and mood, anxiety, low-level cravings and reduced cognitive function, can last months or years.^{1.2, 2.2, 3.2, 4.2}

Like environmental metals and chemicals,⁴¹ recreational drugs such as tetrahydrocannabinol, opiates and cocaine share the capacity to be stored in body tissues.^19.2 Metabolic clearance as detected in blood, urine and oral fluid ceases after a few days for most illicit drugs but may persist up to 4 weeks for cannabis and cocaine users.⁴² However, there is limited data regarding the sequestration to tissues and long-term storage effects.^19.3 Further, many drugs of abuse are also contaminated (either during their manufacture or intentionally) with chemicals such as additives, metals⁴³ irritants and neurotoxins,^{44, 45, 46} which have the potential to cause serious health issues.^47,48

Chemical compounds that are fat soluble or have certain ionic structures readily penetrate the blood–brain barrier, myelin, axonal membranes and synaptic terminals. This applies to most medications and illicit drugs, as well as most pesticides and many persistent organic pollutants. In addition to their temporary effects, compounds with these properties have the potential to alter the normal activity of the nervous system in long-term, neurotoxic fashion. Whether or not the striking changes in architecture and function^{49, 50, 51, 52, 53} are caused by residual drug or chemical stores, underlying cellular changes, or both, is as yet unclear, despite popularly held beliefs about the safety of low-level use.

Illicit substances and toxic chemicals share biotransformation pathways. Biotransformation of both drugs and toxic chemicals involves members of the large cytochrome P450 family (CYP), paraoxonase (PON1; involved in the biotransformation of organophosphate pesticides), glutathione S-transferase and numerous other genes and enzymes.^{54, 55, 56, 57}

Both chemically sensitive and addicted individuals have polymorphisms in the genomic neighbourhoods that regulate the biochemical breakdown and elimination of neurotoxic substances such as drugs, metals and pesticides.⁵⁸ For example, the well-characterized aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2) gene alteration increases sensitivity responses such as flushing and hangovers^59,60.1 as well as sensitivity to certain environmental chemicals.^60.2 Reduced ALDH2 enzyme activity elevates acetaldehyde, thereby increasing the risk of cellular damage⁶¹ and various cancers,^62,63 probably via folate and alcohol metabolic pathways.⁶⁴

Molecular science research on addiction susceptibility has identified polymorphisms potentially related to risk phenotypes representing both environmental events (e.g. flushing and other enzymatic pathways) and psychosocial forces (e.g. impulsivity, reward pathways and disinhibition).^65,66 Cuyàs et al.⁶⁷ have shown that CYP2D6 polymorphisms alter 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA; ‘Ecstasy’) bio-transformation, which impairs cognitive function and causes other health effects. Using a mouse model, Cheng et al.⁶⁸ have shown that enhanced expression of the CYP2D6 detoxification enzyme results in a heightened ability to adapt to serotonin-mediated anxiety pathways.

Both drugs and toxic chemicals influence dopamine reward pathways. Exposure to pesticides, environmental endocrine disrupters and heavy metals has striking effects on the dopaminemediated reward, craving and reinforcing effects of drugs.^14.2 Many of these effects are caused by chemicals that bio-accumulate. The most studied oestrogen mimetic of this type is bisphenol A (BPA). BPA exposure during development heightens adult sensitivity to the reward effects of opiates.^69,70 Animal studies show that oestrogen-like chemicals modulate the dopamineassociated behavioural and reward effects of illicit drugs, cocaine and amphetamines.^71,72 Even heavy metal exposure appears to both predispose to later addiction and increase relapse risk.⁷³

The reactive oxygen species: the nitric oxide-peroxynitrite cycle. The above mechanisms are thought to require the presence of a causative compound. However, the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) pathway may explain persistent cravings, inflammation and even disease after environmental exposure has ceased.

Comprising a family of omnipresent cellular messengers, three NOS isoforms produce nitric oxide (NO), the physiologic function of which varies widely depending on cell type. In a variety of cell types, including brain astrocytes, N-methyl-D- aspartate (NMDA) receptormediated iNOS activity elevates NO and its downstream product peroxynitrite (ONOO–), leading to progressive hypersensitivity of local NMDA receptors^74,75.1 and cellular damage by inhibiting the mitochondrial respiratory chain, which leads to energy failure and ultimately cell death.^76.1,77.1 iNOS has been shown to interact with both xenobiotics and a range of drug compounds^{75.2, 76.2, 77.2, 78} and is implicated in both the cravings and tolerance associated with a variety of abused substances.^79,80

How might the Hubbard regimen produce improvements in well-being and health?

Nutritional elements of the regimen. Smoking, drinking and both licit and illicit environmental chemicals increase oxidative stress and other inflammatory markers.⁸¹ The regimen improves the general diet and provides a broad range of micronutrients that correct nutrient status and support healing.

Although participants are not asked to follow a specific dietary regimen, they are instructed to consume vegetables daily and consumption is tracked on the Daily Report Form. Ingestion of fruits and vegetables provides general protection from the effects of chemical toxins.⁸² Increased vegetable consumption provides nutrients such as α-lipoic acid, which can upregulate ALDH2,⁸³ and isothiocyanates, which act through a variety of mechanisms, including epigenetic induction.⁸⁴

In addition to general dietary improvements, some dietary oils, vitamins and minerals help remediate the reaction products of drug and alcohol degradation, particularly those leading to liver damage (acetaldehyde, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide with hydrogen and reactive oxygen species) and hepatic encephalopathy.⁸⁵

Crystalline niacin (vitamin B3). A comprehensive review of niacin mechanisms is beyond the scope of this paper; however, a few key activities warrant discussion.

Improved Phase II xenobiotic biotransformation. Niacin coenzymes, particularly in the form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, are required for more than 500 enzymatic reactions, including biochemical pathways that modify foreign compounds during their biotransformation and elimination.^86,87 Niacin coenzymes may increase the rate of phase II biotransformation, especially in the liver, a process by which free radicals activated during phase I are rapidly conjugated with glutathione or other compounds and rendered less toxic.⁸⁸

Release of fat-stored compounds into the bloodstream. Although the regimen does not involve fasting, early research demonstrated that fat-stored chemicals are released into the bloodstream when fatty acids are released during fasting.^89,90 Although crystalline niacin initially inhibits adipose free fatty acid release, lipolysis begins approximately 2 hours after ingestion and is maintained for at least 4 hours.^91,92 Several recent studies have replicated the 2–6-hour niacin-mediated release of free fatty acids and explored niacin’s beneficial utility in cardiovascular disease by correcting serum lipid profiles by reducing concentrations of very low-density lipoprotein triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.^{93, 94, 95}

Sauna and exercise influence physiological states. Many studies show the benefits of exercise in promoting deep circulation in the tissues and mobilizing lipid from storage depots.^{96, 97, 98, 99} Both processes aid tissue oxygenation, nutrient status and healing.

Kukkonen-Harjula¹⁰⁰ has suggested that sauna induces subtle endocrine changes, including raised noradrenaline and beta-endorphin levels and activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. Although these changes usually normalize post-treatment, they may partially explain the physical relief described by participants.

Interestingly, sauna therapy and exercise both lower NO levels by upregulating tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) production in vascular tissues as well as through a heat-shock protein-mediated (Hsp90) pathway that slows BH4 degradation. Increased availability of BH4 leads to lower NO levels.¹⁰¹

Limitations

This was an uncontrolled, pre–post, intervention safety study of a convenience sample participating in the NLDP sauna regimen as one component of a multimodal residential substance abuse treatment program that emphasizes behavioural change and life skills. The reported outcome changes should be interpreted with caution. Pre–post-sauna detoxification improvements in health and well-being may be a result of the regimen; however, without a comparison group, it is impossible to know how much change might have occurred over the same length of time from continued sobriety, strong expectations or placebo effect. Intensive daily contact, exercise and improved nutrition may account for improvements regardless of actual elimination of residual drug metabolites, which was not demonstrated or quantified in this study. ASI and GAIN-SS scores were not obtained immediately before or after the NLDP, only at enrolment and discharge for the full program, of which the NLDP is an early component. Future work will measure the observed health changes more precisely.

Future controlled studies should address these limitations and examine the mechanisms of action underlying the measured improvements. These could include validated measurement tools to capture changes in cognitive function, craving and symptoms associated with protracted withdrawal, as well as forensic-quality testing for drug metabolite release.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first large study of a sauna-based chemical detoxification program provided as part of a substance abuse treatment program. Most of the anticipated and unanticipated events experienced during this regimen were transient discomforts. There were no serious medical complications and the program was tolerated well even by individuals with hepatic stresses, if they were given enough abstinence time to permit the liver to begin to heal. The level of client orientation appeared appropriate and sets expectations for managing the anticipated non-harmful flush associated with immediate-release niacin, as well as the discomforts that clients associate with past drug use or chemical exposures.

Completion of the NLDP was accompanied by measurably improved functional health and well-being in both physical and emotional domains. On some SF-36 scales, these improvements were greater than improvements measured during the prior 2 weeks, on average, of acute withdrawal; a phase completed when nursing staff authorize medical release after physical withdrawal symptoms subside. As continued low motivation, physical pain and discomfort, cognitive fogginess, emotional difficulties, low-level cravings and disturbances in sleep are among the key triggers for drug relapse after treatment, additional improvements in these areas may be important for stable recovery.

Participants expressed high levels of satisfaction with the regimen, noting improved energy, mental clarity, emotional stability, reduced cravings, greater well-being and a positive life outlook.

Owing to the prevalence of recurrent addiction cycles and the associated enormous cost and social consequences, the safety and beneficial health effects of the sauna-based Hubbard detoxification protocol demonstrated here suggest the need for additional studies. Important issues that remain unresolved include additional measurements of physical and mental health changes and investigation of whether these are improved through toxic elimination, nutrient and systems restoration or both.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the treatment team and clients at Narconon of Oklahoma for participating in this evaluation.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This evaluation was supported by grants from Narconon International to Chestnut Health Systems.

REFERENCES:

1. Jasinski DR. Opiate withdrawal syndrome: acute and protracted aspects. Ann NY Acad Sci 1981; 362: 183–186.↩, ↩
2. Ashton H. Protracted withdrawal syndromes from benzodiazepines. J Subst Abuse Treat 1991; 8: 19–28.↩, ↩
3. Miller FT. Protracted alcohol withdrawal delirium. J Subst Abuse Treat 1994; 11: 127–130.↩, ↩
4. Rapeli P, Kivisaari R, Autti T, et al. Cognitive function during early abstinence from opioid dependence: a comparison to age, gender, and verbal intelligence matched controls. BMC Psychiatry 2006; 6: 9.↩, ↩
5. Heslin KC, Stein JA, Heinzerling KG, et al. Clinical correlates of health-related quality of life among opioid-dependent patients. Qual Life Res 2011; 20: 1205–1213.↩
6. Raisch DW, Campbell HM, Garnand DA, et al. Health-related quality of life changes associated with buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence. Qual Life Res 2012; 21: 1177–1183.↩
7. McGregor C, Machin A and White JM. In-patient benzodiazepine withdrawal: comparison of fixed and symptom-triggered taper methods. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003; 22: 175–180.↩
8. Millson PE, Challacombe L, Villeneuve PJ, et al. Self-perceived health among Canadian opiate users: a comparison to the general population and to other chronic disease populations. Can J Public Health 2004; 95: 99–103.↩
9. Ryan CF and White JM. Health status at entry to methadone maintenance treatment using the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Addiction 1996; 91: 39–45.↩
10. Neale J. Measuring the health of Scottish drug users. Health Soc Care Community 2004; 12: 202–211.↩
11. Deering D, Frampton C, Horn J, et al. Health status of clients receiving methadone maintenance treatment using the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Drug Alcohol Rev 2004; 23: 273–80.↩
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recognition of illness associated with exposure to chemical agents–United States, 2003. MMWR. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003; 52: 938–940.↩
13. Miller CS. The compelling anomaly of chemical intolerance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001; 933: 1–23.↩
14. Jones DC and Miller GW. The effects of environmental neurotoxicants on the dopaminergic system: a possible role in drug addiction. Biochem Pharmacol 2008; 76: 569–581.↩, ↩
15. Zhang GF, Ren YP, Sheng LX, et al. Dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal axis in opioid dependent subjects: effects of acute and protracted abstinence. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2008; 34: 760–768.↩
16. Wisniewski AB, Brown TT, John M, et al. Cortisol levels and depression in men and women using heroin and cocaine. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2006; 31: 250–255.↩
17. Nashev LG, Vuorinen A, Praxmarer L, et al. Virtual screening as a strategy for the identification of xenobiotics disrupting corticosteroid action. PLoS One 2012; 7: e46958.↩
18. Stephens MA and Wand G. Stress and the HPA axis: role of glucocorticoids in alcohol dependence. Alcohol Res 2012; 34: 468–483.↩
19. Cecchini M and LoPresti V. Drug residues store in the body following cessation of use: impacts on neuroendocrine balance and behavior – use of the Hubbard sauna regimen to remove toxins and restore health. Med Hypotheses 2007; 68: 868–879.↩, ↩, ↩
20. Hubbard LR. Clear Body Clear Mind. 2013 ed. Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, 2013,p.294.↩, ↩, ↩
21. Schnare DW, Denk G, Shields M, et al. Evaluation of a detoxification regimen for fat stored xenobiotics. Med Hypotheses 1982; 9: 265–282.↩, ↩
22. Schnare DW, Ben M and Shields MG. Body burden reduction of PCBs, PBBs and References Page 22 Lennox and Sternquist chlorinated pesticides in human subjects. Ambio 1984; 13: 378–380.↩
23. Dahlgren J, Cecchini M, Takhar H, et al. Persistent organic pollutants in 9/11 World Trade Center rescue workers: Reduction following detoxification. Chemosphere 2007; 69: 1320–1325.↩
24. Tretjak Z, Beckmann S, Tretjak A, et al. Occupational, environmental, and public health in semic: A case study of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) pollution. In: Post-Audits of Environmental Programs and Projects; Proceedings, Environmental Impact Analysis Research Council/ASCE. New Orleans, LA, October 1989, p.57–72.↩
25. Tretjak Z, Root DE, Tretjak A, et al. Xenobiotic reduction and clinical improvement in capacitor workers: a feasible method. J Environ Sci Health 1990; A25: 731–751.↩
26. Kilburn KH, Warsaw RH and Shields MG. Neurobehavioral dysfunction in firemen exposed to polycholorinated biphenyls (PCBs): possible improvement after detoxification. Arch Environ Health 1989; 44: 345–350.↩
27. Tsyb AF, Parshkov EM, Barnes J, et al. Rehabilitation of a Chernobyl affected population using a detoxification method. In: Proceedings of the 1998 International Radiological Postemergency Response Issues Conference. Washington, D.C. USA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998, p.162–6, efile pages 78–82.↩
28. Ross GH and Sternquist MC. Methamphetamine exposure and chronic illness in police officers: significant i mprovement w it h sau na-ba sed detoxification therapy. Toxicol Ind Health 2012; 28: 758–768.↩
29. Lennox RD, Sternquist MA and Paredes A. A simplified method for routine outcome monitoring after drug abuse treatment. Subst Abuse 2013; 7: 155–169.↩
30. Creider JC, Hegele RA and Joy TR. Niacin: another look at an underutilized lipidlowering medication. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2012; 8: 517–528.↩
31. Lavigne PM and Karas RH. The current state of niacin in cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic review and meta-regression. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 440–446.↩
32. MacKay D, Hathcock J and Guarneri E. Niacin: chemical forms, bioavailability, and health effects. Nutr Rev 2012; 70: 357–366.↩
33. Bachem A and Reed CI. The penetration of light through human skin. Am J Physiol 1931; 97: 86–91.↩
34. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Factors associated with health-related quality of life among outpatients with major depressive disorder: a STAR*D report. J Clin Psychiatry 2006; 67: 185–195.↩, ↩
35. Hays RD and Morales LS. The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med 2001; 33: 350–357.↩, ↩
36. Richter D, Eikelmann B and Berger K. Use of the SF-36 in the evaluation of a drug detoxification program. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 907–914.↩
37. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, et al. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients. The Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis 1980; 168: 26–33.↩
38. Dennis ML, Chan YF and Funk RR. Development and validation of the GAIN Short Screener (GSS) for internalizing, externalizing and substance use disorders and crime/violence problems among adolescents and adults. Am J Addict 2006; 15(Suppl 1): 80–91.↩
39. Dennis ML, Feeney T, Stevens LH, et al. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs–Short Screener (GAIN-SS): Administration and Scoring Manual for the GAIN-SS Version 2.0.1. Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems, 2006.↩, ↩
40. US Food and Drug Administration. What is a serious adverse event? http://www.fda.gov/ safety/medwatch/howtoreport/ucm053087.htm (accessed 4 June 2018)↩
41. Carpenter DO, Arcaro K and Spink DC. Understanding the human health effects of Clinical Research Report Page 23 chemical mixtures. Environ Health Perspect 2002; 110(Suppl 1): 25–42.↩
42. Verstraete AG. Detection times of drugs of abuse in blood, urine, and oral fluid. Ther Drug Monit 2004; 26: 200–205.↩
43. Exley C, Ahmed U, Polwart A, et al. Elevated urinary aluminium in current and past users of illicit heroin. Addict Biol 2007; 12: 197–199.↩
44. Martyny JW, Arbuckle SL, McCammon CS, et al. Chemical exposures associated with clandestine methamphetamine laboratories. Denver: National Jewish Medical and Research Center, 2004.↩
45. Martyny JW, Van Dyke MV, McCammon CS, et al. Chemical exposures associated with clandestine methamphetamine laboratories using the hypophosphorous and phosphorous flake method of production. Denver: National Jewish Medical and Research Center, 2005.↩
46. Betsinger G. Coping with meth lab hazards. Occup Health Saf 2006; 75: 50, 52, 54–58, passim.↩
47. Cole C, Jones L, McVeigh J, et al. Adulterants in illicit drugs: a review of empirical evidence. Drug Test Anal 2011; 3: 89–96.↩
48. Crinnion WJ. Environmental medicine, part one: the human burden of environmental toxins and their common health effects. Altern Med Rev 2000; 5: 52–63.↩
49. Ridley NJ, Draper B and Withall A. Alcoholrelated dementia: an update of the evidence. Alzheimers Res Ther 2013; 5: 3.↩
50. Moeller SJ, Konova AB, Parvaz MA, et al. Functional, structural, and emotional correlates of impaired insight in cocaine addiction. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71: 61–70.↩
51. Konova AB, Moeller SJ and Goldstein RZ. Common and distinct neural targets of treatment: changing brain function in substance addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013; 37: 2806–2817.↩
52. Quintero GC. Role of nucleus accumbens glutamatergic plasticity in drug addiction. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2013; 9: 1499–1512.↩
53. Beckley JT and Woodward JJ. Volatile solvents as drugs of abuse: focus on the cortico-mesolimbic circuitr y. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013; 38: 2555–2567.↩
54. Vinayagamoorthy N, Krishnamurthi K, Devi SS, et al. Genetic polymorphism of CYP2D6 *2 C–>T 2850, GSTM1, NQO1 genes and their correlation with biomarkers in manganese miners of Central India. Chemosphere 2010; 81: 1286–1291.↩
55. Sellers EM and Tyndale RF. Mimicking gene defects to treat drug dependence. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 909: 233–246.↩
56. Cui X, Lu X, Hiura M, et al. Evaluation of genetic polymorphisms in patients with multiple chemical sensitivity. PLoS One 2013; 8: e73708.↩
57. Sellers EM, Kaplan HL and Tyndale RF. Inhibition of cytochrome P450 2A6 increases nicotine’s oral bioavailability and decreases smoking. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2000; 68: 35–43.↩
58. Johansson I and Ingelman-Sundberg M. Genetic polymorphism and toxicology– with emphasis on cytochrome p450. Toxicol Sci 2011; 120: 1–13.↩
59. Yokoyama M, Yokoyama A, Yokoyama T, et al. Hangover susceptibility in relation to aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 genotype, alcohol flushing, and mean corpuscular volume in Japanese workers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2005; 29: 1165–1171.↩
60. Nakajima T and Aoyama T. Polymorphism of drug-metabolizing enzymes in relation to individual susceptibility to industrial chemicals. Ind Health 2000; 38: 143–152.↩, ↩
61. Guo XF, Wang J, Yu SJ, et al. Meta-analysis of the ADH1B and ALDH2 polymorphisms and the risk of colorectal cancer in East Asians. Intern Med 2013; 52: 2693–2699.↩
62. Yokoyama A, Tsutsumi E, Imazeki H, et al. Salivary acetaldehyde concentration according to alcoholic beverage consumed and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 genotype. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2008; 32: 1607–1614.↩
63. Yokoyama T, Saito K, Lwin H, et al. Epidemiological evidence that acetaldehyde plays a significant role in the development of decreased serum folate concentration Page 24 Lennox and Sternquist and elevated mean corpuscular volume in alcohol drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2005; 29: 622–630.↩
64. Sangrajrang S, Sato Y, Sakamoto H, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in folate and alcohol metabolism and breast cancer risk: a case-control study in Thai women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 123: 885–893.↩
65. Schuckit MA. An overview of genetic influences in alcoholism. J Subst Abuse Treat 2009; 36: S5–S14.↩
66. Wang JC, Kapoor M and Goate AM. The genetics of substance dependence. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2012; 13: 241–261.↩
67. Cuyas E, Verdejo-Garcia A, Fagundo AB, et al. The influence of genetic and environmental factors among MDMA users in cognitive performance. PloS One 2011; 6: e27206.↩
68. Cheng J, Zhen Y, Miksys S, et al. Potential role of CYP2D6 in the central nervous system. Xenobiotica 2013; 43: 973–984.↩
69. Mizuo K, Narita M, Miyagawa K, et al. Prenatal and neonatal exposure to bisphenol-A affects the morphine-induced rewarding effect and hyperlocomotion in mice. Neuroscience Lett 2004; 356: 95–98.↩
70. Narita M, Miyagawa K, Mizuo K, et al. Prenatal and neonatal exposure to low-dose of bisphenol-A enhance the morphineinduced hyperlocomotion and rewarding effect. Neurosci Lett 2006; 402: 249–252.↩
71. Larson EB and Carroll ME. Estrogen receptor beta, but not alpha, mediates estrogen’s effect on cocaine-induced reinstatement of extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior in ovariectomized female rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007; 32: 1334–1345.↩
72. Silverman JL and Koenig JI. Evidence for the involvement of ERbeta and RGS9–2 in 17-beta estradiol enhancement of amphetamineinduced place preference behavior. Horm Behav 2007; 52: 146–155.↩
73. Nation JR, Cardon AL, Heard HM, et al. Perinatal lead exposure and relapse to drug-seeking behavior in the rat: a cocaine reinstatement study. Psychopharmacology 2003; 168: 236–243.↩
74. Pall ML. Elevated nitric oxide/peroxynitrite theory of multiple chemical sensitivity: central role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the sensitivity mechanism. Environ Health Perspect 2003; 111: 1461–1464.↩
75. Pall ML. Multiple chemical sensitivity is a response to chemicals acting as toxicants via excessive NMDA activity. J Psychosom Res 2010; 69: 327–328; author reply 8–30.↩, ↩
76. Stewart VC and Heales SJ. Nitric oxideinduced mitochondrial dysfunction: implications for neurodegeneration. Free Radic Biol Med 2003; 34: 287–303.↩, ↩
77. Pacher P, Beckman JS and Liaudet L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2007; 87: 315–424.↩, ↩
78. Miller RT. NOx and R-NOx: effects on drug metabolism. Curr Drug Metab 2004; 5: 535– 542.↩
79. Lancaster FE. Alcohol and the brain: what’s NO got to do with it? Metab Brain Dis 1995; 10: 125–133.↩
80. Ma YY, Cepeda C and Cui CL. The role of striatal NMDA receptors in drug addiction. Int Rev Neurobiol 2009; 89: 131–146.↩
81. Calabrese EJ. Obituary notice: LNT dead at 89 years, a life in the spotlight. Environmental Research 2017; 155: 276–278.↩
82. Hennig B, Ettinger AS, Jandacek RJ, et al. Using nutrition for intervention and prevention against environmental chemical toxicity and associated diseases. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115: 493–495.↩
83. Li RJ, Ji WQ, Pang JJ, et al. Alpha-lipoic acid ameliorates oxidative stress by increasing aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 activity in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Tohoku J Exp Med 2013; 229: 45–51.↩
84. Dashwood RH and Ho E. Dietary histone deacetylase inhibitors: from cells to mice to man. Semin Cancer Biol 2007; 17: 363–369.↩
85. Strohle A, Wolters M and Hahn A. [Alcohol intake–a two-edged sword. Part 1: metabolism and pathogenic effects of alcohol]. Med Monatsschr Pharm 2012; Clinical Research Report Page 25 35: 281–292[in German, English Abstract]; quiz 93–4.↩
86. Okamoto H, Ishikawa A, Yoshitake Y, et al. Diurnal variations in human urinary excretion of nicotinamide catabolites: effects of stress on the metabolism of nicotinamide. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77: 406–410.↩
87. Klaidman LK, Mukherjee SK and Adams JDJ. Oxidative changes in brain pyridine nucleotides and neuroprotection using nicotinamide. Biochim Biophys Acta 2001; 1525: 136–148.↩
88. Sies H, Brigelius R, Wefers H, et al. Cellular redox changes and response to drugs and toxic agents. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1983; 3: 200–208.↩
89. Findlay GM and DeFreitas AS. DDT movement from adipocyte to muscle cell during lipid utilization. Nature 1971; 229: 63–65.↩
90. Lambert G and Brodeur J. Influence of starvation and hepatic microsomal enzyme induction on the mobilization of DDT residues in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1976; 36: 111–120.↩
91. Carlson LA and Oro L. The effect of nicotinic acid on the plasma free fatty acid; demonstration of a metabolic type of sympathicolysis. Acta Med Scand 1962; 172: 641–645.↩
92. Carlson LA. Nicotinic acid: the broadspectrum lipid drug. A 50th anniversary review. J Int Med 2005; 258: 94–114.↩
93. Wang W, Basinger A, Neese RA, et al. Effect of nicotinic acid administration on hepatic very low density lipoprotein-triglyceride production. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2001; 280: E540–E547.↩
94. Meyers CD, Kamanna VS and Kashyap ML. Niacin therapy in atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol 2004; 15: 659–665.↩
95. Meyers CD and Kashyap ML. Management of the metabolic syndrome-nicotinic acid. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2004; 33: 557–575, vii.↩
96. Friedberg SJ, Harlan WRJ, Trout DL, et al. The effect of exercise on the concentration and turnover of plasma nonesterified fatty acids. J Clin Invest 1960; 39: 215–220.↩
97. Friedberg SJ, Sher PB, Bogdonoff MD, et al. The dynamics of plasma free fatty acid metabolism during exercise. J Lipid Res 1963; 4: 34–38.↩
98. Taylor AW, Shoemann DS, Lovlin R, et al. Plasma free fatty acid mobilization with graded exercise. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1971; 11: 234–240.↩
99. Wirth A, Schlierf G and Schettler G. [Physical activity and lipid metabolism (author’s transl)]. Klin Wochenschr 1979; 57: 1195–1201[in German, English Abstract].↩
100. Kukkonen-Harjula K and Kauppinen K. How the sauna affects the endocrine system. Ann Clin Res 1988; 20: 262–266.↩
101. Pall ML. Do sauna therapy and exercise act by raising the availability of tetrahydrobiopterin? Med Hypotheses 2009; 73: 610–613.↩
102. Agrawal A, Lynskey MT, Madden PA, et al. A latent class analysis of illicit drug abuse/dependence: results from the NationalEpidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Addiction 2007; 102:94–104.↩